You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Vaniver comments on Open Thread, Jul. 27 - Aug 02, 2015 - Less Wrong Discussion

5 Post author: MrMind 27 July 2015 07:16AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (220)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Douglas_Knight 14 August 2015 02:47:18AM 1 point [-]

The long history is not relevant, but the frequency. Most of Nelson's rules are 1/1000 events. If you don't expect trends to change more often than 1000 measurements, that's too sensitive. I don't know what Elo is measuring every minute, but that probably is too sensitive and most of the hits will be false positives. (Actually, many things will have daily cycles. If Nelson notices them, that's interesting, but after removing such patterns, it will probably be too sensitive.)

Comment author: Vaniver 14 August 2015 01:32:42PM 0 points [-]

I see what you mean--yes, if you're oversampling, you need to downsample / average / whatever to get to the reasonable frequency, otherwise you'll just be doing SPC on noise.