You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Lumifer comments on The horrifying importance of domain knowledge - Less Wrong Discussion

15 Post author: NancyLebovitz 30 July 2015 03:28PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (236)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: LessWrong 01 August 2015 06:14:20PM 1 point [-]

I'm not a programmer, so my view may be a little bit skewed.. but this seems like a list of things that may or may not be correct (and I'd like to put things in a continuum, or percentages, or some other more practically observable other than a list) but it doesn't really get any further than that. How substantial many of the claims are?

I honestly doubt "programmers" get all these wrong. I'm not going to link to a post (I've seen some people replying with a post as if it's a substitute for actually saying what's wrong) or even say that "programmers" is a group too big and perhaps too inclusive to really have anything to say about them. I'll just link to esr's guide on hacking and ask the people who wrote the articles who they were dealing with. I doubt that the "hackers" being talked at esr's guide would do a thing like that. I'd also like to link to the suckless philosophy and ask if the "programmers" and software the writers were dealing with were really what what the suckless philosophy is completely at odds with.

Comment author: Lumifer 01 August 2015 11:37:26PM 0 points [-]

I'll just link to esr's guide on hacking and ask the people who wrote the articles who they were dealing with.

Of course not. Many hackers are programmers, few programmers are hackers. People fitting esr's description are rare and cubicle peons with a keyboard and a screen are legion.