You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

LessWrong comments on The horrifying importance of domain knowledge - Less Wrong Discussion

15 Post author: NancyLebovitz 30 July 2015 03:28PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (236)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: VoiceOfRa 01 August 2015 06:24:41PM 12 points [-]

Gender. This is so short I assume it's seriously incomplete.

It also seems to amount to arguing that we should take people's delusions and hallucinations at face value, as long as those are about there gender. It's also interesting that these are the only type of delusions society is, currently, expected to play along with.

If a man shows up claiming to be both Jesus and John Lennon his beliefs won't be taken seriously and he is likely to be directed towards treatment aimed at curing him of his delusion. On the other hand, if a man shows up claiming to be a woman, we are expected to take him at his word, disregard any other evidence to the contrary, and accommodate this delusion in all kinds of unreasonable ways.

Comment author: LessWrong 06 August 2015 05:50:52AM *  0 points [-]

Meh. I've always thought the gender stuff and many others (not getting into them) are borderline insane, which is why I usually avoid that if possible.

I might be overly cynical but the world runs in it's own way. I'd like to be treated in a certain way but I can hardly blame people for not treating me the way I'd like tp. Nobody owes you anything so you can't ask them to pay their debt. At the end of the day all you can really do is work on yourself and that's it.

Comment author: VoiceOfRa 06 August 2015 08:06:04AM 2 points [-]

I've always thought the gender stuff and many others (not getting into them) are borderline insane, which is why I usually avoid that if possible.

I can understand the sentiment, but history has shown that if insanity is not confronted it expends in both power and depth.

Comment author: LessWrong 07 August 2015 11:13:36AM *  0 points [-]

The problem is that it's a two-way street. What you see is not what I see, and if person X is claiming A, I myself might be seeing D instead. Reality-wise, we would probably have to check their genes, but that's less practical. So instead people go to their intuition and just call them whatever they think fits.

It's also a pretty big offense to call a woman a man, and vice-versa, so there's still risk in that.