You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Dahlen comments on Open thread, Aug. 10 - Aug. 16, 2015 - Less Wrong Discussion

5 Post author: MrMind 10 August 2015 07:29AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (283)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Dahlen 10 August 2015 02:27:29PM 4 points [-]

Meta: How come there have been so many posts recently by the generic Username account? More people wanting to preserve anonymity, or just one person who can't be bothered to make an account / own up to most of what they say?

Comment author: Username 10 August 2015 09:40:17PM 5 points [-]

The similar formatting of the comments suggests that in this thread it's mostly one person with a lot of links to share.

Personally, I just haven't been bothered to make an account, and have been using the username account exclusively for about 5 years. I'd estimate 30-50% of all the posts on the account were made by me over this timeframe, though writing style suggests to me that a good number of people have used it as a one-shot throwaway, and several people have used it many times.

Comment author: Vaniver 10 August 2015 06:08:07PM 5 points [-]

just one person who can't be bothered to make an account

My dominant hypothesis is at least three people who couldn't be bothered to make accounts, and that this has further normalized the usage of Username as a generic lurker account.

Comment author: ChristianKl 10 August 2015 06:30:39PM 2 points [-]

That leaves the question of whether that's okay or whether we should simply disable the account.

Submitting...

Comment author: Dahlen 11 August 2015 09:06:58AM 2 points [-]

Oh, I wasn't suggesting that; I was just hoping that whoever has been exclusively posting from that account can take a hint and consider using LW the typical way. It's confusing to see so many posts at once by that account and not know whether there's one person or several using it.

Comment author: Davidmanheim 11 August 2015 04:36:22AM 0 points [-]

It's interesting looking at the raw data breakdown of non -anonymous versus anonymous votes.

Comment author: Elo 11 August 2015 06:53:37AM -1 points [-]

that's creepy; also if you take away all the anonymous votes then there are very few votes (5). That might be normal for polls here. Hard to tell.

Also to note; I voted with my account here and it does not appear in the raw poll data. I don't know why.

Comment author: bbleeker 11 August 2015 08:50:44AM 5 points [-]

Anonymous voting is the default, and I always leave it on.

Comment author: Davidmanheim 19 August 2015 11:45:14PM -1 points [-]

I'd prefer to see accountability be a default, with anonymity whenever desired.

Comment author: ChristianKl 11 August 2015 09:00:28AM 2 points [-]

All votes are done by real accounts. There a checkbox under a poll that marks whether your vote is annonymous or isn't by default it's toggled for annonymous votes.

Comment author: Elo 10 August 2015 10:45:14PM *  1 point [-]

I think its a reasonable solution to people not wanting to make an account or also the occasional anonymous post. I have used it once or twice to make separate comments.

But I should add that you can see a list of your nearest meetups if you set your location on your own account.

Edit: holy hell the person who posted all the OT comments here is really annoying and should make an account and stop link-dropping. If the account is being abused that bad we should shut it down and I would change my vote in the poll.

Comment author: [deleted] 11 August 2015 04:23:53PM 3 points [-]

From the upvote to downvote ratio it looks like more members think the posts by Username in the open thread are worthwhile - at the time of writing they are mostly among the higher top-level comments on this week's open thread, and several have sparked at least a bit of subsequent discussion in the form of follow up comments.

True, they're only links (with quoted text) but this doesn't particularly strike me as abuse of the Username account.

Comment author: Elo 11 August 2015 05:45:27PM 1 point [-]

I am suspicious of the link-drop attitude to posting anywhere. Even if it looks to have value added this time.