You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Lumifer comments on Crazy Ideas Thread, Aug. 2015 - Less Wrong Discussion

7 Post author: polymathwannabe 11 August 2015 01:24PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (240)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Lumifer 11 August 2015 03:03:31PM *  2 points [-]

Why is Cuba a better target of annexation than, say Mexico? Or Puerto Rico? Or the whole lot of Caribbean islands? (I assume imperialist fat cats want beaches for their model girlfriends to tan on)

Comment author: Squark 11 August 2015 08:07:57PM 4 points [-]

Puerto Rico?! But Puerto Rico is already a US territory!

Comment author: DanielLC 11 August 2015 10:28:58PM 3 points [-]

We'll make it a double territory.

Comment author: Lumifer 11 August 2015 08:36:22PM 0 points [-]

Minor details :-P

Comment author: buybuydandavis 12 August 2015 02:25:52AM 0 points [-]

That just went bankrupt. Maybe they can show us how it's done.

Comment author: James_Miller 11 August 2015 03:34:22PM 1 point [-]

If you are going to conquer a country make it a rich one. Ignoring morality, the best target would be Canada.

Comment author: skeptical_lurker 11 August 2015 06:55:45PM 2 points [-]

Would the rest of NATO be obliged to defend Canada?

Also, I assume the idea is to annex failed states, not functioning ones.

Comment author: James_Miller 11 August 2015 08:13:18PM 0 points [-]

Yes NATO would be obliged to defend Canada, but the U.S. would probably give them an out by saying that we are not really invading but fulfilling the long-held desire of true Canadians to join the United States.

Comment author: Lumifer 11 August 2015 03:49:44PM 1 point [-]

Canada would totally work, they have oil! X-D