You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Tem42 comments on Crazy Ideas Thread, Aug. 2015 - Less Wrong Discussion

7 Post author: polymathwannabe 11 August 2015 01:24PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (240)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Tem42 13 August 2015 05:33:21PM *  0 points [-]

Yes - you could have other translation problems if you liked. You could have recipes that called for 240ml of flour (although there are good reasons to go by weight); or you could have recipes that call of 3.5 oz. of flour. But right now we have a lot of recipes that are carefully designed to be easily measured under one system or another (75 g; 1/2 cup). Changing systems makes the measurements come out less conveniently, whichever way you choose to change them.

Of course, there are no shortage of recipes that do use the metric system, so basically this is a resistance to rotating out cookbooks.

You are correct about the terminology; technically, the system used in the U.S. is United States customary units. I have never heard that phrase spoken aloud, although this could be a problem with the people I speak to, rather than any indication of common usage.

[Edited to adjust for polymathwannabe's correction -- thank you. The 240 is what I intended, but the 250 was an error.]

Comment author: polymathwannabe 13 August 2015 08:07:46PM 0 points [-]

240ml of flour

The liter and its derived units are primarily used to measure liquids. For flour you use grams.

Comment author: tut 18 December 2015 08:01:34PM 2 points [-]

I use dl. I have one of the most popular Swedish cook books, and it consistently gives volumes of flour, baking soda etc.