You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Elo comments on How to learn a new area X that you have no idea about. - Less Wrong Discussion

12 Post author: Elo 18 August 2015 05:42AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (39)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Elo 20 August 2015 03:08:03PM 1 point [-]

I hope my reasons are reasonable about that...

Comment author: Lumifer 20 August 2015 03:49:50PM 1 point [-]

Well, you are on LW. It's... unusual to find here reactions which can uncharitably be summed up as "OMG, the freaks like it, what's WRONG with it??!?"

Comment author: Elo 20 August 2015 04:04:43PM 1 point [-]

It sounds that bad? Dangit!

I am aiming to generate rationality content that is applicable to mainstream; clearly I am not doing that if my hypothesis was correct.

Does that statement make sense?

Comment author: Lumifer 20 August 2015 04:09:36PM 1 point [-]

It sounds that bad? Dangit!

I have a nasty mind and a propensity for snark, so I can't guarantee that my reaction matches the mainstream :-P

I am aiming to generate rationality content that is applicable to mainstream

If you actually are aiming at a target, you need to define it a bit better. "Mainstream" is very very fuzzy and a lot of that mainstream is pretty dumb.

Comment author: Elo 20 August 2015 04:14:23PM 1 point [-]

how about replace "mainstream" with "a large number of people"

Comment author: Lumifer 20 August 2015 04:19:34PM 1 point [-]

That's just making things fuzzier.

There is usual advice that one should write for a particular audience. Who is your intended audience?

Comment author: Elo 20 August 2015 05:40:35PM 1 point [-]

My purpose was, "generate rationality content". And create a guide where I could not previously find a guide describing how to learn a new skill X.

Who might find this guide useful? (a similar question to who is my intended audience)

  • people trying to learn a new skill X
  • rationalists trying to understand the meta-process of learning

I am not sure how to better test for those two groups of people.

Comment author: Lumifer 20 August 2015 06:08:12PM 2 points [-]

people trying to learn a new skill X

So, let's try a couple of different examples. Let's take (1) the skill of sailing a small boat; and (2) the skill of starting a social interaction with strangers. Do you think your guide would be useful for these two specific examples?

rationalists trying to understand the meta-process of learning

Trying to understand how learning actually happens, or how, from your point of view, it's supposed to happen?

Comment author: Elo 20 August 2015 11:46:42PM 1 point [-]
  1. people trying to learn a new skill X
  2. rationalists trying to understand the meta-process of learning

2 first - I meant - learning how to learn. or trying to get better at techniques of learning.

1a. sailing: I just ran through the first few points in my head (took about 5-10 minutes); and yes it seems to work for sailing.

1b. social interactions with strangers: yes it works. It occurs to me that there is no indication of how long each step should take. I am going to add that in as a guide.

Comment author: Clarity 21 August 2015 11:01:57AM *  0 points [-]

Say you're aiming to catch a bear. So you put out a a pile of fish. A crow eats one. Does that mean that bears don't like fish? No, and while you're thinking about that you might any bears going for the fish.

Comment author: Elo 22 August 2015 09:49:12AM 0 points [-]

Cryptic as that is; I understand; trouble is that the bears didn't eat many fish. So maybe these bears don't like the fish that I put out...