You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

buybuydandavis comments on How to fix academia? - Less Wrong Discussion

9 Post author: passive_fist 20 August 2015 12:50AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (33)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: buybuydandavis 21 August 2015 08:41:42PM 2 points [-]

The practice can occur when researchers submitting a paper for publication suggest reviewers, ...

This is obviously corrupt, even with "real" reviewers. I review you, you review me. Our clique reviews each other. I wonder if we'll approve of each other. Duh.

Comment author: passive_fist 23 August 2015 10:49:20PM *  1 point [-]

The original idea behind this was to make the editor's job easier by suggesting experts in the field, and also to demonstrate that the authors are familiar with other people's work. The editor is then expected to use this information to aid in the actual selection process, and there is no guarantee that the editor will actually pick who the author suggested. In reality, what sometimes happens is lazy editors simply picking whoever the author suggested.