You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

PhilGoetz comments on The Sleeping Beauty problem and transformation invariances - Less Wrong Discussion

1 Post author: aspera 23 August 2015 08:57PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (7)
Tags: invariance tranformation priors paradox beauty sleeping

Comments (7)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: PhilGoetz 25 August 2015 01:19:41PM 0 points [-]

a requirement that any prior be invariant under the acquisition of new information

Isn't this true by definition? "Prior" means "prior to the acquisition of new information."

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit