You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Clarity comments on Stupid Questions September 2015 - Less Wrong Discussion

4 Post author: polymathwannabe 02 September 2015 06:26PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (174)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Clarity 03 September 2015 12:42:33PM 1 point [-]

I'm ashamed to ask but...is there a way I can do machine learning competitions on Kaggle...by just copy pasting code?

Comment author: gwern 03 September 2015 04:26:26PM 6 points [-]

What would you expect to get out of copy-pasting code to do a ML competition?

Comment author: Clarity 12 September 2015 06:26:14AM 0 points [-]

Understanding how the techniques work and how they relate to outcomes on a particular kind of problem. That would help me understood where a particular technique can be applied for what particular problems. With that knowledge, I could hire someone to do the machine learning coding if and only if I could expect it to be worth our while. Actually doing the coding could be automated soon enough. There is already visual programming for machine learning. And I reckon the cohort of people doing machine learning are more likely to be skilled in automating programming procedures than computer scientists on average. So, I do not expect it worthwhile to learn the nitty gritty of data-science in depth, but rather the concepts in breadth.

Comment author: Houshalter 09 September 2015 06:11:41AM 1 point [-]

Literally every competition has people post code that gets ok results. Just search in the forum for "beat the benchmark". This is intended to help beginners get started.