You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

twanvl comments on [LINK] Vladimir Slepnev talks about logical counterfactuals - Less Wrong Discussion

7 Post author: Squark 03 September 2015 06:29PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (10)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Manfred 04 September 2015 06:25:44AM *  1 point [-]

Man, that sleeping beauty digression at the end. I'm so easily aggroed.

I wonder if I should write up a rant or a better attempt at exposition, against this "clearly the problem is underdetermined" position. The correct answer is somewhat difficult and all expositions I've seen (or written!) so far have had big shortcomings. But even if one didn't know the right answer, one should readily conclude that a principled answer exists. We assign things probabilities for fairly deep reasons, reasons undisturbed by trifles like the existence of an amnesia pill.

That aside, good talk :)

Comment author: twanvl 04 September 2015 04:28:23PM 2 points [-]

I wonder if I should write up a rant or a better attempt at exposition, against this "clearly the problem is underdetermined" position.

You should.