You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Jiro comments on Probabilities Small Enough To Ignore: An attack on Pascal's Mugging - Less Wrong Discussion

20 Post author: Kaj_Sotala 16 September 2015 10:45AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (176)

Comments (176)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Jiro 16 September 2015 06:51:06PM 1 point [-]

I see the key flaw in that the more exceptional the promise is, the lower the probability you must assign to it.

According to common LessWrong ideas, lowering the probability based on the exceptionality of the promise would mean lowering it based on the Kolomogorov complexity of the promise.

If you do that, you won't lower the probability enough to defeat the mugging.

If you can lower the probability more than that, of course you can defeat the mugging.

Comment author: [deleted] 17 September 2015 12:47:01AM 1 point [-]

If you can lower the probability more than that, of course you can defeat the mugging. And one of the key problems with lowering it more is that it becomes really really hard to update when you get evidence that the mugging is real.

Comment author: V_V 19 September 2015 11:29:03AM 0 points [-]

If you do that, you won't lower the probability enough to defeat the mugging.

If you do that, your decision system just breaks down, since the expectation over arbitrary integers with probabilities computer by Solomonoff induction is undefined. That's the reason why AIXI uses bounded rewards.

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit