You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Lumifer comments on Some thoughts on meta-probabilties - Less Wrong Discussion

0 Post author: iarwain1 21 September 2015 05:23PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (15)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Lumifer 23 September 2015 04:20:39PM *  1 point [-]

Let me express my approach in a slightly different way.

Let's say I have a sample of some numbers and I'm interested in the properties of future numbers coming out of the same underlying process.

The simplest approach (say, Level 1) is to have a point estimate. Here is my expected value for the future numbers.

But wait! There is uncertainty. At Level 2 I specify a distribution, say, a Gaussian with a particular mean and standard deviation (note that it implies e.g. very specific "hard" probabilities of seeing particulate future numbers).

But wait! There is more uncertainty! At Level 3 I specify that the mean of that Gaussian is actually uncertain, too, and has a standard error -- in effect it is a distribution (meaning your "hard" probabilities from the previous level just became "soft"). And the variance is uncertain, too, and has parameters of its own.

But wait! You can dive deeper and find yet more turtles down there.