You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Good_Burning_Plastic comments on Hypothetical situations are not meant to exist - Less Wrong Discussion

1 Post author: casebash 27 September 2015 10:58AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (22)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: VoiceOfRa 28 September 2015 02:35:54AM 3 points [-]

If a hypothetical is unspecified, and you ask for it to be clarified, then that isn't fighting the hypothetical.

Unfortunately, people will rarely actually do that. In particular, I've yet to see anyone else ask, much less answer, what appears to be highly relevant information in the classic train-switch dilemma: what are these people doing on the track?

Re: Too divorced from reality. "But fighting the hypothetical by challenging the premises of the scenario is exactly the same as saying, "I don't find this topic interesting for whatever reason, and wish to talk about something I am interested in."" - TimS

2) People are often too ready to consider things as a trap. Some people will claim that any convincing or hard to argue against statement is a "trap"

The problem with hypotheticals is that they're fictional evidence that you're asking people to generalize from.

Comment author: Good_Burning_Plastic 30 September 2015 10:08:13AM 2 points [-]

what are these people doing on the track?

The version of the dilemma I'm familiar with specifies that all six people had been kidnapped by a mentally ill philosopher and tied onto the tracks against their will.