You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Good_Burning_Plastic comments on Open thread, Oct. 5 - Oct. 11, 2015 - Less Wrong Discussion

7 Post author: MrMind 05 October 2015 06:50AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (346)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: VoiceOfRa 13 October 2015 12:11:58AM 4 points [-]

In which case there's still the issue that it seems to correlate with said deficiencies.

Comment author: Good_Burning_Plastic 17 October 2015 07:42:02PM *  1 point [-]

I think it's more because of restriction-of-range effects (people who have both low IQ and said deficiencies are likely to be in their parents' basements so we don't usually see them, and people who have both are likely to be in places like DC so we don't usually see them either) than because they actually correlate in the whole population.

Comment author: VoiceOfRa 18 October 2015 03:35:59AM 3 points [-]

Well, autism causes both for starters.

Comment author: Good_Burning_Plastic 18 October 2015 10:04:24AM *  0 points [-]

What?

EDIT: Do you mean the technical meaning or the colloquial meaning? The former aren't that smart in average...

Comment author: VoiceOfRa 18 October 2015 04:43:04PM *  2 points [-]

Autism is a spectrum. Here I mean the ones whose social skills aren't so ban its impossible to meaningfully interact with them.

EDIT: fixed typo.

Comment author: Good_Burning_Plastic 19 October 2015 06:49:14AM -1 points [-]

And having social skills so bad it's impossible to meaningfully interact with you causes high IQ? What?