You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Lumifer comments on Emotional tools for the beginner rationalist - Less Wrong Discussion

3 Post author: Gleb_Tsipursky 09 October 2015 05:01AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (44)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Lumifer 09 October 2015 03:48:46PM *  0 points [-]

I am talking about people whose maps are not even approximately correct, but they still keep them because... I am only guessing here... they still provide emotional comfort.

Two points. First, a very important word here is "matters". A lot of maps don't matter. If I believe that there are adepts meditating in secret caves in Tibet and they have direct access to the the Akashic records and so can see into the future and into the past -- so what? Does that affect my life in any way? (note, by the way, the difference between "could matter" and "does matter").

Second, an incorrect map is also known as "fiction". That makes for an interesting connection to the parallel thread about the use{full|less}ness of fiction.

Comment author: Viliam 09 October 2015 07:33:54PM *  0 points [-]

I enjoy fiction. Also, when I talk e.g. with religious people, I imagine that we are all talking about some imaginary world; then it doesn't bother me that their arguments do not apply to our world. I can discuss Bible the same way I can discuss Tolkien, and sometimes it's fun. Only when people remind me that they actually believe the elves are real, it gets weird.

Your first example... that's also in the weird territory. I could enjoy it as a fiction. I don't see any other use for it. -- Is it just an aesthetic difference?