You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

polymathwannabe comments on LINK: An example of the Pink Flamingo, the obvious-yet-overlooked cousin of the Black Swan - Less Wrong Discussion

3 Post author: polymathwannabe 05 November 2015 04:55PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (75)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: polymathwannabe 07 November 2015 05:33:27AM -2 points [-]

19th century doctors had been selected for unusually high willpower

Thanks, I needed a big laugh today. Your grasp of artificial selection is completely ludicrous.

Comment author: VoiceOfRa 07 November 2015 05:43:38AM *  5 points [-]

Wow, you totally fail at reading comprehension.

Hint: the word "selection" has meanings besides the biological one.

Comment author: polymathwannabe 07 November 2015 01:56:55PM 0 points [-]

Still implausible. At which point did willpower factor in the career path of an aspiring 19th-century doctor (in a way that it doesn't today)?

Comment author: VoiceOfRa 07 November 2015 04:48:53PM 2 points [-]

I never said it doesn't today.

Comment author: polymathwannabe 07 November 2015 05:30:06PM 0 points [-]

Your earlier comment implied that there was something specific about 19th-century doctors that prevented them from realizing how dangerous cocaine was. Today we know it's dangerous. What did you intend to say was different about doctors back then?

Comment author: VoiceOfRa 11 November 2015 05:48:50AM 2 points [-]

What did you intend to say was different about doctors back then?

The fact that today we have data on its effects on people who aren't high-willpower doctors.

Comment author: polymathwannabe 11 November 2015 02:50:55PM 0 points [-]

You're answering a different question. First you said 19th-century doctors were especially willpowered, then you said willpower is also a factor in today's doctors. Now you say the difference is not willpower but the population examined. You're not only not giving any evidence for you claims; you're running in circles.

Comment author: VoiceOfRa 11 November 2015 09:58:29PM 5 points [-]

Reread my comments again. Your failure at basic English comprehention is not my problem.

Comment author: [deleted] 21 November 2015 06:27:43PM 0 points [-]

I think he's saying that the original population didn't notice it because of high willpower, then it get into the mainstream population who didn't have as high willpower, at which point we began to get data on the effects in a low willpower situation.