You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Clarity comments on How do you choose areas of scientific research? - Less Wrong Discussion

5 Post author: FrameBenignly 07 November 2015 01:15AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (22)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: LessRightToo 07 November 2015 01:54:55AM *  4 points [-]

This is a fascinating and complex topic. To make the question tractable, I suggest first clarifying "you". Are we discussing a graduate student selecting a research topic for his/her PhD program? Are we discussing a professor who already has tenure? Are we discussing someone performing R&D in a corporate environment? Are we discussing a 'citizen scientist'? The four individuals I've identified here face very different situations.

I'm not an economist, but my understanding is that there exists a small subset of economists who are challenging the notion that productivity maximization is the proper goal of economics, considering that already realized past economic growth may be seriously damaging this planet's capability to sustain life. This just goes to show that trying to dictate a general goal for any field of study is likely to encourage the emergence of contrarians.

Comment author: Clarity 07 November 2015 06:16:24AM 2 points [-]

Love your name. Are you alluding to trade-offs between false positives and negatives with it?

Comment author: LessRightToo 08 November 2015 11:59:56AM 3 points [-]

No - just a reminder to myself that sometimes my attempt to be less wrong has the opposite effect.