You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

gjm comments on [Link] Lifehack Article Promoting LessWrong, Rationality Dojo, and Rationality: From AI to Zombies - Less Wrong Discussion

9 Post author: Gleb_Tsipursky 14 November 2015 08:34PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (71)
Tags: effectivealtruism ea intentionalinsights wordspreading agency raisingsanitywaterline rationality

Comments (71)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: gjm 17 November 2015 04:39:09PM 4 points [-]

This is pretty standard for nonprofit websites.

Just to be clear: is InIn a nonprofit?

... Aha, this page on the website says it's a 501(c)(3) nonprofit. It might be worth making that more explicit somewhere easier to find, because one thing I thought on looking over the website was "huh, that's interesting: they seem to be trying hard to give the impression of being a nonprofit without actually saying in so many words that they are; I wonder why".

Comment author: Gleb_Tsipursky 17 November 2015 07:07:55PM 2 points [-]

Thanks for pointing that out. The curse of knowledge is such a powerful fallacy, and we fell prey to it.

I had the website revised to insert mentions of InIn being a nonprofit on the front page, and on the About Us page. Here's the link to our Guidestar profile for anyone interested.

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit