You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Vaniver comments on The Market for Lemons: Quality Uncertainty on Less Wrong - Less Wrong Discussion

8 Post author: signal 18 November 2015 10:06PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (43)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Lumifer 19 November 2015 05:23:12PM *  2 points [-]

I conclude from the discussion that the term "rich" is too vague.

Not that I suggest that everyone adopt these definitions, but I usually use these words in the following meaning:

  • Rich -- "financially independent", you don't have to work if you don't want to and still have at least upper-middle-class lifestyle.

  • Upper-middle -- not worry about money too much, it's sufficient for comfortable and socially adequate lifestyle, but you need a high-paying job and can't really afford expensive extravagances.

  • Middle -- money is kinda OK, you can afford all the necessities and some (but not many) luxuries.

  • Lower-middle -- money is tight, you can afford most necessities, but few if any luxuries

  • Lower -- Paycheck to paycheck (if you have a job), no reserves, any crisis can thoroughly screw you up.

Comment author: Vaniver 19 November 2015 05:36:33PM *  2 points [-]

I just split people into "spends less than half of what I do," "reasonable," and "spends more than twice what I do." [/joke]

Comment author: Lumifer 19 November 2015 05:45:30PM *  2 points [-]

Yeah, these are also known as "poor bastards", "regular people", and "rich bastards" :-D