You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

HungryHobo comments on [Link] A rational response to the Paris attacks and ISIS - Less Wrong Discussion

-1 Post author: Gleb_Tsipursky 23 November 2015 01:47AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (275)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: HungryHobo 24 November 2015 03:34:09PM 0 points [-]

It's far far harder for a faction to defend itself when their enemies have massive air support and they do not.

Isis lose with or without boots on the ground if their current enemies in the region are simply given heavy air support and supplies.

Putting boots on the ground, Benefits:

More local control.

Better trained soldiers.

Cons:

Expense cash.

Expense lives.

Needing to run an occupation.

Difficulty of nation building due to resentment against your new state from local peoples about foreign occupiers.