You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

polymathwannabe comments on Linguistic mechanisms for less wrong cognition - Less Wrong Discussion

7 Post author: KevinGrant 29 November 2015 02:40AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (130)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: gjm 30 November 2015 10:08:13PM 0 points [-]

Should languages be designed for language students?

Comment author: polymathwannabe 30 November 2015 10:17:28PM 1 point [-]

For natural languages it's a moot question, but conlangs are inescapably intended for the use of people who are already inclined to study languages.

Comment author: gjm 30 November 2015 10:29:56PM 1 point [-]

Indeed they are, but the more serious kind of conlang is surely intended to be usable as an actual practical means of expression and communication. If some design decision makes things better for students one way and for actual users another way, it's surely better to choose the latter.

(Of course we don't know that the present situation is like that. It's entirely possible that the success of English hasn't been in any way helped by its heavy use of context for disambiguation, or by advantages that that somehow enables.)

Comment author: polymathwannabe 30 November 2015 10:41:30PM *  0 points [-]

The success of English, you ask?

(cough) British Empire (cough)