You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Lumifer comments on The value of ambiguous speech - Less Wrong Discussion

4 Post author: KevinGrant 30 November 2015 07:58AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (37)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Lumifer 30 November 2015 08:42:22PM 1 point [-]

Is a lack of ambiguity necessary for clear thinking? Are there times when it's better to be ambiguous?

No. Yes.

I interpret "ambiguity" as "having multiple meanings in the given context". It can be a bad thing or a good thing. The "optimal level of ambiguity", I think, is very much situation-dependent and I'm not optimistic about formulating any general rules for that.

Off the top of my head I can come up with a couple of way ambiguity is useful. One is when you are thinking at several levels simultaneously. In such a case ambiguity can provide vital linkages between levels helping to keep them in sync. Two is when you use ambiguity to postpone choosing a path for a bit. Here it's similar to a wavefunction which you might find convenient to hold in an uncollapsed state for while and then collapse it (= resolve the ambiguity) at the right moment.