You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

kithpendragon comments on The value of ambiguous speech - Less Wrong Discussion

4 Post author: KevinGrant 30 November 2015 07:58AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (37)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: kithpendragon 07 December 2015 01:21:15AM 0 points [-]

Your discussion points are all over the map. We've gone way off the topic of ambiguity vs. specificity. It sounds like you've got an ax to grind against Lojban, and now Loglan as well. I'm not here to help you with that.

fe'o

Comment author: ChristianKl 07 December 2015 01:52:40AM 0 points [-]

I think it's worthwhile to critize the flaws of existing languages. I don't have a specific ax to grind against Lojban. It's an interesting experiment that provides data.

It's a more interesting language to learn from then from a language like ROILA which is much worth thought out.