Elo comments on Weirdness at the wiki - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (82)
.2. As I stated in the post above - I explicitly talk about this action when I described you as (""hiding behind" the label of Tell Culture"):
.4. example (stated again):
.7. no, I read your words. When you say:
.9. And now have responded with not being able or willing to:
.12. Yes, I directly quoted OscarWilde in his descriptions of "spider-in-a-human-suit", then on being notified that it was uncalled for, I modified the original post with words to a similar effect. I know exactly what I did, and what I said.
.13. You then said:
.15. yes. As I said (and edited the original post);
.17. You then said:
.19. To which I took offence (and outlined in my next post; and again) here:
.22. I am laying out in this post the nature of my interpretation of everything you have said. This should clear everything up; and has been a monumental waste of time.
.24. This is offensive and not relevant. you are avoiding doing the thing you said you would do, ("Generally orient toward being open and transparent about my activities and motives.") by attacking my character.
.25. each point is now numbered so that I and you can quote the number in future responses and stop quoting the same words.
I'm actually not interested in further continuing the discussion, as there is an effort made at reading minds and motivations. I think there's way too much danger of typical mind fallacy and illusion of transparency from both sides, and I don't want to make statements that I would later regret. So I'm tapping out.