You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Gleb_Tsipursky comments on Weirdness at the wiki - Less Wrong Discussion

7 Post author: NancyLebovitz 30 November 2015 11:37PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (82)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Gleb_Tsipursky 03 December 2015 04:23:11AM *  0 points [-]

I would suggest not taking Lumifer's description of his initial impression of the sign-up page as indicative of the app itself. I think there's sufficient evidence of Lumifer being not unbiased in describing Intentional Insights content. So consider checking out the app itself.

Here are the study proposals themselves, which you can evaluate yourself for whether they are A/B split testing: 1, 2.

EDIT Forgot to mention, my comment on the nature of NancyLebovitz's question had to do with my own desire to signal that this is a very important question to me, not give praise.