= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Trevor_Blake comments on Help with understanding some non-standard-LW philosophy viewpoints - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (47)
You'll find more errors in your thinking seeking critics than supporters, and so your questions are good questions.
Egoism fits that description. I wrote the book on it! "Confessions of a Failed Egoist" has all the answers. Read more at...
Tinyurl.com/theuniqueone
In what way?
Given your url, I assume you're well aware of Stirner. I don't think his egoism fits that description.
Do you want to give us, say, one or two paragraphs that might help readers here judge whether following your not-even-actually-a-link is worth the trivial inconvenience it poses?
How so? Would you say that the sun arises tomorrow because you have an egoistic intuition that it does? Do you believe that personal preference shouldn't just be used to decide whether X or Y is better but also whether X or Y is true?