You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Algernoq comments on timeless quantum immortality - Less Wrong Discussion

2 Post author: Algernoq 06 December 2015 04:14AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (52)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Algernoq 08 December 2015 06:56:33AM 0 points [-]

Thank you again for the thoughtful reply.

Your brain decoheres a zillion times per second. Your consciousness is far, far, far into the classical regime.

Observing does not cause collapse. Events which cause the wavefunction to split into dynamically separate parts do, and those happen at the same rate in a system regardless of how you cut it.

Eh? Observing is the only thing that causes collapse.

I agree that there are constant tiny thermodynamic events that, if observed, could cause decoherences a zillion times a second. But, usually these events are not observed.

Decoherence is me finding out which world I end up in, and this only happens as quickly as I think, once every ~1/10 seconds when I'm awake.

I'm guessing you would say that decoherence is my brain ending up in some world, and this happens every time any entropy-increasing chemical event happens.

How can I experimentally tell the difference between these? It's not obvious because even a high-speed detector requires me to read the readout with my (slow) brain. From my perspective, the detector doesn't collapse any wavefunctions until I look at it. I agree with you that if I looked at another brain I would see that brain decohering / doing thermodynamic stuff all the time. I also agree with you that if I looked at my own brain I would see my own brain doing a bunch of stuff really rapidly. You would say that my brain decoheres as quickly as a detector measures it. I would say that my brain decoheres only as quickly as I notice detector readouts. Until I look at the detector, my brain and the detector are in a superposition of states with different possible detector readouts.

I don't know how to test this.

Comment author: Luke_A_Somers 08 December 2015 09:50:24PM 4 points [-]

That isn't the relationship between decoherence and observation.

Decoherence events are when a quantum system splits into multiple parts that are no longer dynamically accessible to each other. At this point, they are in different worlds.

Observation events have to be decoherence events. Observation has no other role in quantum mechanics other than that in order to observe, you must decohere.

So, whether or not you observe things, you are in some world of dynamically mutually accessible states, and this will evolve into many dynamically inaccessible components with or without your observing it. By the time you've observed anything, it's way too late to get from one to another.

Comment author: Algernoq 09 December 2015 09:20:21AM 0 points [-]

In that case, it seems like Quantum Immortality doesn't work.

And here I thought I was safe. Dammit.

Comment author: Luke_A_Somers 09 December 2015 05:15:23PM 1 point [-]

Well, the nice form you described here doesn't work. The kind of lousy usual form does, with the usual caveats.

Comment author: Algernoq 11 December 2015 06:44:34AM *  0 points [-]

I agree provided the many-worlds interpretation is correct, which seems likely.

If the consciousness-causes-collapse interpretation is correct (which seems less likely), then the special form I described might still work. But I can't count on it.