You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Good_Burning_Plastic comments on Maximizing Donations to Effective Charities - Less Wrong Discussion

7 Post author: Gleb_Tsipursky 07 December 2015 06:13PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (29)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Good_Burning_Plastic 13 December 2015 01:27:50PM 0 points [-]

Solar flares may be pretty bad now that we are so reliant on the power grid but they hardly are an existential risk, Yellowstone erupts about once every 800,000 years in average which is hardly short-term, and asteroid impacts large enough to worry about are even rarer than that.

Comment author: ChristianKl 13 December 2015 08:55:48PM 0 points [-]

Rarity of events doesn't mean they can't happen in the short term.

Comment author: Good_Burning_Plastic 14 December 2015 03:24:47AM 1 point [-]

It doesn't mean that they can't happen as in "probability equals zero", but it does mean that the probability that they happen in any given decade is pretty much negligible.

Comment author: ChristianKl 14 December 2015 08:54:37AM 1 point [-]

Whether a probability is negligible dependends on the impact of an event and not only it's probability.

Comment author: Good_Burning_Plastic 14 December 2015 05:06:54PM 1 point [-]

Well, for that matter it also depends on what you can do about it, and I have no idea how we would go about preventing Yellowstone from erupting.

Comment author: gjm 14 December 2015 06:13:18PM 1 point [-]

We might be able to reduce the harm it did, even if we couldn't stop it erupting.

Comment author: ChristianKl 14 December 2015 08:42:21PM 0 points [-]

Well, for that matter it also depends on what you can do about it, and I have no idea how we would go about preventing Yellowstone from erupting.

I remember a proposal about cooling down Yellowstone by putting a lake on top of it.

If you spent more money you can ram carbon nanofiber rods deep into the ground. If the rod is thick enough the lave shouldn't do much damage to it and it can very effectively transport temperature to the top. Maybe you get even electricity as a bonus for cooling down Yellowstone so the project would pay for itself.