You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

MattG comments on Promoting Effective Giving Using List-Style Articles - Less Wrong Discussion

9 Post author: Gleb_Tsipursky 16 December 2015 08:08PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (10)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: [deleted] 17 December 2015 05:20:33PM 4 points [-]

In this case I would consider social shares more of a vanity metric. Sharing socially could even negatively correlate, because sharing socially is a good way to get the social good will of being savvy and a donor, without actually doing any of the steps listed. List articles frequently have the problem of being shared and bookmarked without leading to action, due to the paradox of choice.

If you do a similar article in the future, it'd be cool to link right through to a donation page, pop a cookie on the persons browser, and see if they end up donating in the next couple months.

Comment author: Gleb_Tsipursky 17 December 2015 06:44:40PM 2 points [-]

I hear you, it's hard to determine these things fully. I do think social sharing is weak evidence - again, people choose to put their social capital behind it, and it gets post-factum cognitive justification going.

A stronger piece of evidence is this case study from a comment on my personal FB page about someone who was convinced to donate to effective charities from an article I wrote.

Other evidence is important, of course, and I like your idea!

Comment author: ChristianKl 18 December 2015 12:24:28PM 0 points [-]

Sharing socially could even negatively correlate, because sharing socially is a good way to get the social good will of being savvy and a donor,

In this case I don't think so. Sharing such an article is bound to produce situations in which other people ask you for your donation habits.

Comment author: [deleted] 18 December 2015 04:37:49PM 2 points [-]

Possibly... at least in the US there seems to be a social taboo against those sorts of questions.

Comment author: ChristianKl 20 December 2015 08:44:08PM 0 points [-]

Normally yes, but do you think the taboo would still exists when person shares an article like that?

Comment author: [deleted] 22 December 2015 07:57:08PM 0 points [-]

I went ahead and shared it a couple of days ago and so far haven't gotten any comments. How did you fare?

Comment author: ChristianKl 22 December 2015 11:16:35PM 0 points [-]

How did you fare?

I haven't shared it myself.

Comment author: [deleted] 20 December 2015 09:29:34PM 0 points [-]

Sounds like a good time for an experiment... let's both share it and see what comments we get.