You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

MattG comments on Open Thread, Dec. 28 - Jan. 3, 2016 - Less Wrong Discussion

10 Post author: Clarity 27 December 2015 02:21PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (144)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 28 December 2015 02:15:49PM *  1 point [-]

Depending on which view is correct, there may or may not be a market demand for your solution.

This question is something that keeps me up at night.

In the long term, I'm confident that if the latter case is true, my solution will (eventually) outcompete anyone using mangement consultants. Because of the blockchain based business model, this is a possibility that the company (in the loosest sense of the word) can handle. This would be worst case scenario.

Comment author: Good_Burning_Plastic 29 December 2015 10:36:38AM *  1 point [-]

(eventually)

"The market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent."

Comment author: [deleted] 30 December 2015 07:56:53AM *  0 points [-]

"The market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent."

That's not how the blockchain works - once the app is there, it exists forever( at least as long as other apps are using that same blockchain), and it can limp along as long as it needs to until the market catches up. It's one of the key reasons I chose the business model I did (which allows investors to make money from the app being succesful, no matter whether that's from an application of the protocol IM using, or someone else)