You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

seuoseo comments on Polling Thread January 2016 - Less Wrong Discussion

4 Post author: Gunnar_Zarncke 03 January 2016 05:43PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (17)
Tags: poll

Comments (17)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: seuoseo 03 January 2016 11:02:00PM 4 points [-]

I got 65%, but don't have the karma to vote.

Comment author: gjm 04 January 2016 12:38:35AM *  3 points [-]

I am about to submit an (anon) 65% vote to make up for this.

[EDITED to add:] Now done. (Of course the reason for the two-phase approach, as opposed to just doing it, was to minimize the risk of two people doing it concurrently.)

Comment author: Gunnar_Zarncke 04 January 2016 07:37:38AM 1 point [-]

For those reading only: The current state is 17 votes, median 67, mean 66.795. This is significantly below the population average. I wonder about the cause...

Comment author: Dardan- 04 January 2016 09:45:07AM *  1 point [-]

One person filled in a 0.51, but even corrected for that the mean is 69,76 (at 17 votes). My hypothesis would be that it has to do with the likely disproportionate percentage of users here that have Aspergers, something that is known to be associated with a poor ability to understand faces.

Comment author: username2 04 January 2016 01:00:00PM 3 points [-]

Wouldn't we see a bimodality if that was the case?

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit