You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Good_Burning_Plastic comments on Open Thread, January 4-10, 2016 - Less Wrong Discussion

5 Post author: polymathwannabe 04 January 2016 01:06PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (430)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Good_Burning_Plastic 04 January 2016 03:41:10PM *  2 points [-]

I am 85% sure The Lion is Eugine Nier.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 04 January 2016 05:18:27PM 0 points [-]

The_Lion is possibly karma-mining in Quotes, but doesn't seem to be malicious. What's your line of thought?

Comment author: Good_Burning_Plastic 04 January 2016 05:40:12PM 5 points [-]

The Lion started posting "abruptly" with no signs of being a newbie, not very long after VoiceOfRa was banned (much like VoiceOfRa did after Azathoth123 was banned and Azathoth123 did after Eugine Nier was). Also, the first comments of The Lion have been on points that the previous EN incarnations also often made, and their writing styles sound very similar to me.

Comment author: gilch 05 January 2016 05:55:59AM 1 point [-]

I've heard of narrow AIs that can supposedly identify an author from their writings. I'm not certain how accurate they are, or how much material they need, but perhaps we could use such a system here to identify sockpuppets and make ban evasion more difficult.

Comment author: Lumifer 05 January 2016 06:48:11PM 1 point [-]

narrow AIs that can supposedly identify an author from their writing

It's not a "narrow AI", it's a straightforward statistical model. Or, if you prefer, an outcome of machine learning applied to texts of different authors.

identify sockpuppets

A voting sockpuppet doesn't post except to get the initial karma. It just up- and down-votes -- there is no text to analyse.

Comment author: gjm 05 January 2016 08:52:20PM 0 points [-]

There's a pattern of voting to analyse, though...

Comment author: Lumifer 05 January 2016 08:57:54PM 0 points [-]

Sure, but that's a much easier problem.

Comment author: gjm 05 January 2016 10:13:06PM 0 points [-]

I'm not convinced it actually is. (To get useful information out of, that is.)

Comment author: gilch 05 January 2016 07:24:20PM *  0 points [-]

It's not a "narrow AI"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_AI It is by that definition. Of course, words are only useful if people understand them. I know LW has some non-standard terminology. Point me to the definitions agreed upon by this community and I'll update accordingly.

A voting sockpuppet doesn't post except to get the initial karma.

Sounds like the initial karma threshold is too low. I have various other ideas about how to fix the karma system, but perhaps I should hold off on proposing (more) solutions before we've discussed the problem thoroughly. If that's already been started I should probably continue from there, otherwise, do you think this issue (karma problems) merits a top-level discussion post?

Comment author: Lumifer 05 January 2016 08:12:18PM -2 points [-]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_AI It is by that definition.

I still don't think so. "AI" is a very fuzzy term (the meaning of which changes with time, too) but in this case what you have is a fairly plain-vanilla classifier which I see no reason to anoint with the "intelligence" title.

do you think this issue (karma problems) merits a top-level discussion post?

Karma has been extensively (and fruitlessly) talked about here. If you want to write a top-level post about your proposals, it might be a good idea to acquaint yourself with the previous discussions here (as well as the experience of other forums, from Slashdot to Reddit).

Comment author: Baughn 05 January 2016 02:13:04PM 0 points [-]

I would be very interested in trying one of those. In particular, I frequently change up my writing style (deliberately), and it might be able to tell me what I'm not changing.

Comment author: CronoDAS 05 January 2016 06:39:50PM 0 points [-]

Hopefully we aren't going to have to implement an IP ban or something...

Comment author: Lumifer 05 January 2016 06:49:29PM 1 point [-]

You don't want to get into an arms race. Especially given that one side fields Trike as front-line troops.

Comment author: username2 06 January 2016 12:43:50PM 0 points [-]

There are VPNs for circumventing that, although getting a VPN is harder than creating a new account.