= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
casebash comments on Consequences of the Non-Existence of Perfect Theoretical Rationality - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (47)
+1. Thanks for this feedback, I've edited as follows:
"If perfect rationality doesn't exist in at least some circumstances(edited), then if you want to assume it, you have to prove that a relevant class of problems has a perfectly rational agent."
The point I was making is that you can prove for a large class of real world problems that such a rational agent exists, so most things remain the same, except for the fact that you have to add an additional line in your proofs quoting a general result that proves a perfectly rational agent exists in the particular type of situation.