You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

casebash comments on Consequences of the Non-Existence of Perfect Theoretical Rationality - Less Wrong Discussion

-1 Post author: casebash 09 January 2016 01:22AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (47)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: casebash 12 January 2016 01:59:32AM 0 points [-]

If you create an actual infinity then things get weird. Many intuitive rules don't hold. So I don't want an actual infinity.

Comment author: LessWrong 12 January 2016 07:14:34AM 1 point [-]

But a large, unknown number could easily be some sort of infinity.

Let's look at it another way. Say I choose some unknown number as you described. Any reason I couldn't be enlightened by "well, if you had chosen number+1, you could have saved the universe"?

I definitely am lacking in my mathematical knowledge so if there's a way to deal with un-measured numbers I'd appreciate if someone could enlighten me.

Comment author: casebash 12 January 2016 12:32:01PM 0 points [-]

"But a large, unknown number could easily be some sort of infinity." - it could if I hadn't specified that we are assuming it is finite.

Comment author: LessWrong 12 January 2016 05:18:49PM 0 points [-]

Then the best decision is to make some calculations, say, how much suffering per 1m/km2 on average, multiply that by how much of the universe you can observe, then add an incredibly large amount of 9s to it's right side. Use all the excess utility to expand your space travel and observation and save the other planets from suffering.