You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Val comments on Are we failing the ideological Turing test in the case of ISIS? (a crazy ideas thread) - Less Wrong Discussion

-1 Post author: Val 09 January 2016 04:42PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (108)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 09 January 2016 10:43:34PM 3 points [-]

I'm not quite as bitter as you are about rationalists, but it's certainly true that people get a lot wrong, and in particular, they're generally bad at checking on whether their means are a good match for their purposes. The planning fallacy is a good though unflamboyant example of people getting things wrong even when they have years of evidence that they underestimate how long it takes to get things done.

My guess about ISIS is a mixture of a desire for personal power and drama, combined with some hope that Allah will help make the Caliphate work.

Thanks for the pointer to "The Fire Raisers". Have an anti-Communism/anti-decadence story by Kipling on a similar theme: the Mother Hive.

Comment author: Val 10 January 2016 01:39:43AM 0 points [-]

Wow, that seems to be the most anvilicious support for conservatism I've ever seen! Still, I enjoyed reading it, thank you for linking to it. Just getting to know this story was worth writing the article.