You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Gunnar_Zarncke comments on [link] "The Happiness Code" - New York Times on CFAR - Less Wrong Discussion

13 Post author: Kaj_Sotala 15 January 2016 06:34AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (12)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Gunnar_Zarncke 15 January 2016 11:26:24PM *  3 points [-]

The eye-rolling:

People tend to hear about the group from co-workers (usually at tech companies) or through a blog called LessWrong, associated with the artificial-intelligence researcher Eliezer Yudkowsky, who is also the author of the popular fan-fiction novel ‘‘Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality.’’ (Yudkowsky founded the Machine Intelligence Research Institute (MIRI), which provided the original funding for CFAR; the two groups share an office space in Berkeley.) Yudkowsky is a controversial figure. Mostly self-taught — he left school after eighth grade — he has written openly about polyamory and blogged at length about the threat of a civilization-ending A.I. Despite this, CFAR’s sessions have become popular.

I think this is a fair description and the eye-rolling is really the "despite this" which is comprehensible. More strong is this:

Compulsive and rather grandiose, Yudkowsky is known for proclaiming the imminence of the A.I. apocalypse (‘‘I wouldn’t be surprised if tomorrow was the Final Dawn, the last sunrise before the earth and sun are reshaped into computing elements’’) and his own role as savior (‘‘I think my efforts could spell the difference between life and death for most of humanity’’).

but backs it up with quotes.

Comment author: philh 16 January 2016 08:26:46PM 7 points [-]

Note that these quotes are from 2001 or earlier.

Also, new pet peeve: quotes databases that don't provide sources. This one even tells you how you can cite itself, as if that gives it any authority.

Comment author: IlyaShpitser 16 January 2016 12:15:39AM 5 points [-]

Yup, EY brought enough rope, no reason to spin more.