You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

rpmcruz comments on To contribute to AI safety, consider doing AI research - Less Wrong Discussion

26 Post author: Vika 16 January 2016 08:42PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (39)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: gjm 21 January 2016 09:53:02AM *  1 point [-]

Why is regulation ungood?

Because all regulation does is redistribute power between fallible humans.

I am missing a step in your argument. Why is redistributing power between fallible humans ungood? I mean, surely some humans are more fallible than others, some have more information than others, some have incentives to be fallible in particularly harmful ways, etc.

(I am not arguing in favour of any particular bit of regulation; I just don't see that "regulation is bad because it just redistributes things between fallible humans" makes any more sense than "trade is bad because it just redistributes things between fallible humans".)

Comment author: rpmcruz 29 January 2016 12:06:28PM 0 points [-]

"Why is redistributing power between fallible humans ungood? I mean, surely some humans are more fallible than others, some have more information than others, some have incentives to be fallible in particularly harmful ways, etc."

This is what Stalin said as well.

Comment author: gjm 29 January 2016 01:48:13PM 0 points [-]

Reversed stupidity is not intelligence.

(Perhaps that's actually your point and you're not agreeing with Lumifer but suggesting that he dislikes regulation only because he associates it with the USSR, or something. In that case, I think you're being unfair; he's smarter than that.)

Comment author: rpmcruz 31 January 2016 08:41:24PM 1 point [-]

The system you described requires someone to be on top.

For a more elaborate response, see Animal Farm. :)

Comment author: gjm 01 February 2016 12:56:32AM -1 points [-]

I didn't describe a system.

What you're saying seems to be a fully general counterargument against all forms of government. There's nothing necessarily wrong with that -- anarchism is a real thing, after all -- but you're not going to be taken seriously if you suggest that anything other than anarchism must be wrong because Stalin ran a government.