You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

TRIZ-Ingenieur comments on Yoshua Bengio on AI progress, hype and risks - Less Wrong Discussion

7 Post author: V_V 30 January 2016 01:45AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (6)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: TRIZ-Ingenieur 30 January 2016 04:02:34PM 2 points [-]

But people underestimate how much more science needs to be done.

The big thing that is missing is meta-cognitive self reflection. It might turn out that even today's RNN structures are sufficient and the only lacking answer is how to interconnect multi-columnar networks with meta-cognition networks.

it’s probably not going to be useful to build a product tomorrow.

Yes. Given the architecture is right and capable few science is needed to train this AGI. It will learn on its own.

The amount of safety related research is for sure underestimated. Evolution of biological brains never needed extra constraints. Society needed and created constraints. And it had time to do so. If science gets the architecture right - do the scientists really know what is going on inside their networks? How can developers integrate safety? There will not be a society of similarly capable AIs that can self-constrain its members. These are critical science issues especially because we have little we can copy from.