You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Lumifer comments on Identifying bias. A Bayesian analysis of suspicious agreement between beliefs and values. - Less Wrong Discussion

7 Post author: Stefan_Schubert 31 January 2016 11:29AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (26)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Viliam 03 February 2016 12:10:11PM *  0 points [-]

And, similarly, it is odd that the Slovak libertarian party is labeled “extreme right-wing” seeming to rule out the possibility of including it in a left coalition giving it control of civil liberties.

Well, in Slovakia "left-wing" means communists, so the civil liberties are a right-wing topic here. The current "left-wing" topic is how we need to hire hundreds of new policemen, to protect us from the immigrant hordes.

I think that the communists in the post-communist countries are psychologically an equivalent of the religious right in the countries that didn't have communism. That's another part of what makes speaking about "left" and "right" so confusing.

Comment author: Lumifer 03 February 2016 04:29:28PM 1 point [-]

I think the word you need is "statism" -- the belief that strong central power is the best. It is shared by e.g. communists and fascists.

Comment author: Viliam 04 February 2016 09:00:51AM *  0 points [-]

Thanks, I know the word, but 99+% people in my country still insist on using "left-wing". Including the "left-wing" politicians.

Attaching labels is already a part of the political battle.

Comment author: Lumifer 04 February 2016 05:35:54PM 2 points [-]

99+% people in my country still insist on using "left-wing"

They are not wrong :-) The left wing tends to more statist than the right wing.