You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

polymathwannabe comments on Open thread, Feb. 01 - Feb. 07, 2016 - Less Wrong Discussion

3 Post author: MrMind 01 February 2016 08:24AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (177)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Crux 06 February 2016 07:47:56AM *  0 points [-]

They are in no way an endorsement of the offending behavior.

Let's consider two of the lines from Jiro's post:

  • If you don't want people to be convicted of rape based on evidence obtained by torture, you also "want rape to be legal"

  • Normally saying that someone wants X carries the connotation that they like X and don't believe X causes harm, which isn't true in this case.

Put together, it seems obvious that Jiro is pointing out a verbal technicality and you're interpreting him as if he means what he's explicitly saying he doesn't mean.

Jiro's post is highly contextual and makes sense only by taking into account what he's responding to. You may want to re-read the subthread.

Comment author: polymathwannabe 06 February 2016 04:39:51PM 0 points [-]

Upvoted for skillful use of diplomacy.