You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Lumifer comments on Religious and Rational? - Less Wrong Discussion

3 Post author: Gleb_Tsipursky 09 February 2016 08:12PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (86)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Lumifer 10 February 2016 09:30:49PM 2 points [-]

I would add group C: people who do not make a personal choice, but rather just become whatever the social circle around them (which can be defined more narrowly or more widely) expects them to be. They just say whatevs... and take the default offering.

Comment author: buybuydandavis 12 February 2016 04:03:57AM *  1 point [-]

For many people, the Truth is what is socially useful.

And though I find it revolting, I have a hard time saying they're wrong. Well being for a member of a social species is largely determined by social status and allegiances.

Comment author: Lumifer 12 February 2016 05:06:44AM *  1 point [-]

I have a hard time saying they're wrong

Wrongness, of course, depends on what you're optimizing for.

If you really really want to be a bona fide member of your tribe, well, then you live by your tribe's fate and you die by your tribe's fate.

Some people would call you loyal. Other people would call you a sheep.

Comment author: buybuydandavis 12 February 2016 06:05:15AM 1 point [-]

Some people would call you loyal. Other people would call you a sheep.

And some would call you wise in the ways of winning.

Comment author: Val 10 February 2016 10:44:12PM 0 points [-]

I agree, but my point was not a comprehensive segmentation of the whole population, but the existence of the groups I mentioned. Also, the border between B and C might be blurry.