Some of the smarter (large, naval) landmines are arguably both intelligent and unfriendly. Let us use the standard AI risk metric.

I feel that your sentence does refer to something: A hypothetical scenario. ("Godhood" should be replaced with "Superintelligence").

Is it correct that the sentence can be divided into these 4 claims?:

1. An AI self-improves it's intelligence
2. The self-improvement becomes recursive
3. An AI reaches superintelligence through 1 and 2
4. This can happen in a process that can be called "runaway"

Do you mean that one of the probabilities is extremely small? (E.g., p(4 | 1 and 2 and 3) = 0.02). Or do you mean that the statement is not well-formed? (E.g, Intelligence is poorly-defined by the AI Risk theory)