You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Manfred comments on The ethics of eating meat - Less Wrong Discussion

6 Post author: necate 17 February 2016 07:03PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (59)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Manfred 18 February 2016 07:13:36PM *  0 points [-]

I think this is a case where utilitarianism is misleading. Don't dash yourself against the problem of "what is the correct preference-elicitation and preference-aggregation algorithm for all living things." Just try to figure out what your own preferences say about animals dying vs. you eating meat.

In my own case, I am basically fine with killing chickens - suppose you gave me a button that paid me fifty cents and killed a chicken (somehow avoiding externalities). I would press this button all day. On the other hand, I would not press this button if it killed a pig - the payout would have to be much bigger ($50? $200?) before I'd do it.

Once I know about this preference of mine, I can let it affect my purchasing habits appropriately.