You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Mark_Friedenbach comments on AIFoom Debate - conclusion? - Less Wrong Discussion

11 Post author: Bound_up 04 March 2016 08:33PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (48)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 06 March 2016 04:08:13PM 0 points [-]

Doubling time of 1 year is not a FOOM. But thank you for taking the time to write up a post on AI safety pulling from modern AI research.

Comment author: turchin 06 March 2016 06:03:28PM 1 point [-]

It is not foom, but in 10-20 years it results will be superinteligence. I am now writing a post that will give more details about how I see it - the main idea will be that AI speed improvement will be at hyperbolic law, but it will evolve as a whole environment, not a single fooming AI agent.