You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Val comments on Rationality Quotes Thread March 2016 - Less Wrong Discussion

5 Post author: elharo 05 March 2016 06:44PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (44)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: elharo 06 March 2016 01:08:28AM -2 points [-]

It is comfortable for richer people to think they are richer because of the moral failings of the poor. And that justifies a paternalistic approach to poverty relief using vouchers and in-kind support. But the big reason poor people are poor is because they don’t have enough money, and it shouldn’t come as a huge surprise that giving them money is a great way to reduce that problem—considerably more cost-effectively than paternalism.

-- Charles Kenney, "For Fighting Poverty, Cash Is Surprisingly Effective", Bloomberg News, June 3, 2013

Comment author: Val 07 March 2016 03:58:03PM 3 points [-]

For a counter-example, see the story of almost every lottery winner ever, who was poor before winning the lottery, and ended up poor again soon enough.

Comment author: Brillyant 08 March 2016 08:10:50PM 1 point [-]

I know there are many cases of this, but is it as universally true as you say?

And apart from lottery winners, is there evidence that smaller windfalls are squandered in a high percentage of cases?