You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

indexador2 comments on Rationality Quotes Thread March 2016 - Less Wrong Discussion

5 Post author: elharo 05 March 2016 06:44PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (44)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: ChristianKl 07 March 2016 10:44:10PM 3 points [-]

An investigator who hoped to learn something about what scientists took the atomic theory to be asked a distinguished physicist and an eminent chemist whether a single atom of helium was or was not a molecule. Both answered without hesitation, but their answers were not the same. For the chemist the atom of helium was a molecule because it behaved like one with respect to the kinetic theory of gases. For the physicist, on the other hand, the helium atom was not a molecule because it displayed no molecular spectrum.

Thomas Kuhn in The Structure of Scientific Revolutions

Comment author: indexador2 08 March 2016 12:41:43AM 1 point [-]

A high school student would say no, because by definition a molecule has more than one atom.

Comment author: Silver_Swift 09 March 2016 12:44:02PM 4 points [-]

That depends entirely on your definition (which is the point of the quote I guess), I've heard people use it both ways.