You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

zalo comments on What is the future of nootropic drugs? Why can't there be ones more effective than ones that have existed for 15+ years? - Less Wrong Discussion

5 Post author: InquilineKea 06 March 2016 06:45PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (20)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: zalo 09 March 2016 12:23:30AM 2 points [-]

Most, if not all of the nootropics out there are so-called "small molecule" drugs; their relatively simple molecular structure lends itself to easy synthesis (but wide-ranging, unpredictable effects within the human body).

Pharmaceuticals (and hopefully nootropics) in general are progressing toward more "large molecule" medicines (or "biologics" as this informative page on Bayer's site terms) that are much harder to design and manufacture, but have a more directed/precise effect within the human body.

All of the top "new" nootropics gwern listed (except phenylpiracetam) are peptides, which qualify as "large molecule"s. But, while we stumbled across many of those, in the future it should be feasible to design targeted peptides, taking into account the receptors we'd like to target, thus having fine-grained control over the effect of the drug.

The problem is that there are too many regulations and not nearly enough money in "nootropics" to attract the investment necessary develop a targeted nootropic peptide from the ground-up.