You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

James_Miller comments on AlphaGo versus Lee Sedol - Less Wrong Discussion

17 Post author: gjm 09 March 2016 12:22PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (183)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: turchin 09 March 2016 03:58:33PM 8 points [-]

I think that MIRI did a mistake than decided not be evolved in actual AI research, but only in AI safety research. In retrospect the nature of this mistake is clear: MIRI was not recognised inside AI community, and its safety recommendations are not connected with actual AI development paths.

It is like a person would decide not to study nuclear physics but only nuclear safety. It even may work until some point, as safety laws are similar in many systems. But he will not be the first who will learn about surprises in new technology.

Comment author: James_Miller 09 March 2016 04:08:32PM 3 points [-]

MIRI will never have a comparative advantage in doing the parts of AI research that the big players think will lead to profitable outcomes.

Comment author: Manfred 10 March 2016 03:38:55PM 1 point [-]

They might indeed have comparative advantages, though not absolute ones.