You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

SquirrelInHell comments on Rationality Reading Group: Part V: Value Theory - Less Wrong Discussion

6 Post author: Gram_Stone 10 March 2016 01:11AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (31)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: SquirrelInHell 20 March 2016 05:31:57AM 1 point [-]

Ah, okay. I went downstairs for a minute and thought to myself, "Well, the only way I get what he's saying is if we go up a level and assume that the given utilities are not simply changing, but are changing according to some sort of particular rule."

Congratulations on good thinking and attitude :)

Does that make sense?

Yes, I get that. What I meant to suggest to you in the broader picture, is that this "tremble" might be evolution's way to crudely approximate a fully rational agent, who makes decisions based on VOI.

So it's not necessarily detrimental to us. Sometimes it might well be.

The main takeaway from all that I have said is it that replacing your intuition with "let's always take option A because it's the rational thing to do" just doesn't do the trick when you play multiple games (as is often the case in real life).